• Monday, May 20, 2024
An Independent Initiative to Celebrate Good Governance

Transforming lives: Enhancing ease of living of citizens

Oct 11, 2021
Author: Amitabh Kant/Amit Kapoor

New Delhi: One of the most prevalent themes of India’s developmental efforts has centred around improving the ease of living of citizens. While the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a metric is critical for assessing a country’s growth, it does not encapsulate significant elements that impact the well-being of citizens. Improving access to basic provisions such as housing, water, health, and education enhances the ease of living of citizens and boosts productivity and economic growth that sustains over time. Ensuring basic needs for people to warrant development has been propagated by experts across the globe. It stemmed from widespread concern that economic development at the country level does not ensure better access to bare necessities for the population at the grassroots.

Provisions for shelter, clean water and sanitation, healthcare facilities must be secured for all citizens before any concrete long term economic progress occurs. Fortifying better economic opportunities and ease in mobility are other critical aspects of sustained growth, just as safeguarding rights and security for a dignified experience of the people is vital for their well-being. Individual welfare should also be strengthened for all in terms of financial inclusion, better environmental quality and sustainable development.

Over the past five years, India has improved its performance across sectors, from water and sanitation to e-governance and digital infrastructure provisions. The average share of Internet subs per 100 population has increased from 27.95 in 2015 (March) to 61.57 in 2020 (March). The average Share of Gram Panchayats with Internet Connectivity also leapfrogged from 11.37 in 2016 to 77.01 in 2020. Principal Source of Drinking Water (per 100 distributions) also increased from 32.4 in 2012 to 40.0 in 2018.

In recognition of the need for this holistic development, the Government of India made efforts to improve the lives of the citizens of India. Initiatives such as Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) - both urban and rural, Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Urban Livelihoods Mission (DAY-NULM), Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) - both urban and rural, Jal Jeevan Mission, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM), Mahatma Gandhi Employment Guarantee Act 2005 (MGNREGA), have catapulted India’s development trajectory.

Since there cannot be a single unit of measure to understand the depth of quality of life and progress that is prevalent in a country, it is incredibly essential to devise a mechanism that ensures better evaluation of living standards and development. Such an assessment does not negate the value of economic growth alone, but it seeks to develop an evaluation that also looks at social progress in conjunction with economic progress. In furthering this goal of enhancing the quality of life of the people of India, NITI Aayog is launching the ‘Ease of Living: State and District Level Assessment’ which has been developed and analyzed by the Institute for Competitiveness, India.

The assessment imbibes the spirit of cooperative and competitive federalism whilst examining citizens' quality of life at the state and district levels. It seeks to go beyond the conventional assessment of progress through a country’s GDP growth since it only measures material well-being and fails to account for a broader understanding of the well-being of a region and its inhabitants. It is a standard of measurement that provides for a wider scope and outlook. The elements we choose to measure plays a decisive role in designing, formulating and implementing policies.

The GoI has made various attempts to drive ease of living in the country. The government distributed close to 80 million gas cylinders under the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) to combat indoor air pollution caused due to traditional cooking stoves. PMUY was implemented to prevent mortality due to household and ambient air pollution, for which India was the second-largest contributor globally, before the scheme's launch. In improving healthcare and environmental outcomes, the government also distributed 350 million LED bulbs throughout the country under its renowned UJALA scheme.

Ease of Living, as a concept, can be characterized as a multidimensional system that contributes to all its inhabitants’ physical, social, and mental well-being. It investigates both the current standard of living of citizens and the prominent ecosystem that drives opportunities to boost living standards. It is imperative to measure the performance of states and districts based on parameters that are crucial for providing a decent standard of living. Therefore, it must be evaluated across 28 states and 9 union territories at the state level and 712 districts at the district level.

For a nation as diverse as India, examining living standards and implementing policy decisions in the wake of data-driven assessments is imperative. In terms of size, a state like Rajasthan is as large as Germany; In terms of population, people residing in Uttar Pradesh alone exceed the entire population of Russia. Understanding ease of living thus necessitates an analysis that considers aspects of regional and demographic disparities. Regional disparity is often present across states and within districts of a state as well. The maternal mortality ratio is higher in Assam at 237 and significantly lower in Kerala at 46. The states in the same region also showcase varied differences; for example, in the North-Eastern region, Tripura has a net enrolment ratio in school of over 94 per cent, whereas Sikkim exhibits a net enrolment ratio that is just over 45 per cent.

It is important to note that policy decisions cannot always be taken centrally as an all-inclusive approach to solving developmental issues. National or state-level decisions may not be sufficient to address region-specific concerns in terms of demands and necessities. Therefore, a district-level study can steer progress at the grassroots and ensure the utilization and mobilization of resources in the most efficient manner. It would enable local governments to identify their strengths and weaknesses and identify focus areas to address challenges in specific domains.

As the nation advances in its development trajectory, a measuring tool such as Ease of Living would help guide transformation through data-driven policy decisions. It would create a consensus on what is critical for enhancing better development outcomes in the areas of social, economic, and environmental sectors. Such plausible efforts would ensure that India’s economic progress is aligned with advancements made in improving the ease of living of the citizens of India from the national level to the grassroots. /PIB/

(Amitabh Kant is CEO, NITI Aayog. Amit Kapoor is chair, Institute for Competitiveness, India and visiting scholar, Stanford University)

More In Public Affairs

NEP-2020 aspires for inclusive excellence in school education

 

Rajeev Ranjan Roy          

 

The New Education Policy-2020 (NEP-2020), unveiled recently, aims at achieving excellence in school learning by imparting quality, affordable and inclusive education to all, with an extra emphasis on those children coming from socially and educationally disadvantaged groups of the society. It is a futuristic endeavour towards building Ek Bharat, Shrestha Bharat. The previous education policies largely focussed on the issues of access and equity in giving school education, while the NEP-2020 commits to laying the foundation of a vibrant Bharat where no one is devoid of a kind of school education, which helps every student become an asset for the nation in a true sense. The unfinished agenda of the National Policy on Education 1986, which was modified in 1992, has been effectively dealt with in the NEP-2020 along with the vision behind the Right to the Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, which “laid down legal underpinnings for achieving universal elementary education.”

Given the undisputed role of education in nation building, the NEP-2020 rightly lays the stress on standardization and accreditation of school infrastructure and teachers as well, since education with accountability, transparency and affordability is the need of the hour, and hence the need to “empower schools, teachers with trust, enabling them to strive for excellence and perform at their very best, while ensuring the integrity of the system through the enforcement of complete transparency and full public disclosure of all finances, procedures and outcomes.” Since private sector is significantly present in the field of school education, the idea to promote ‘not-for-profit’ entities is a unique feature of NEP-2020, which at the same time intends to promote private philanthropic efforts for quality education, thereby affirming the public-good nature of education, while protecting parents and communities from arbitrary increase in tuition fees.

An equally important area, which has got due attention in the NEP-2020 is the need for efficient resourcing and effective governance through school complexes and clusters, a significant initiative in view of the fact that nearly 28 per cent of India’s public primary schools and 14.8 per cent of upper primary schools have less than 30 students. The average number of students per grade in the elementary schooling system – Grades 1 to 8 – is about 14, with a notable proportion having below six students during 2016-17, the year which also had 1,08,017 single-teacher schools, and majority of them – 85,743 – being primary schools taking care of Grades 1-5 children. It was, therefore, a pressing need to evolve a mechanism for establishing a grouping structure, say, school complexes, consisting of one secondary school together with all other schools, which lead to greater resource efficiency and more effective functioning, coordination, leadership, governance, and management of schools in the cluster. This will not only ensure optimum utilisation of resources, but will also foster the sense of oneness and togetherness among the school children, who are the future of the nation.

What further makes the New Education Policy-2020 uniquely special is its pledge for equitable and inclusive education for all, one of the great dreams of our founding fathers. Education, as the NEP-2020 rightly envisions, is “the single greatest tool for achieving social justice and quality.” Inclusive and equitable education, indeed an essential goal in its own right, is also critical to achieving a social order where every citizen has “the opportunity to dream, thrive, and contribute to the nation.” Quality, affordable and ethical education to all is the first move to break multiple social and economic barriers, which sow the seeds of exclusion, discrimination and exploitation against our own people on different parochial considerations.

Needless to say efforts were made in the past as well to bridge the educational chasm between socially and educationally disadvantaged groups (SEDGs) and the children of top social strata, but the desired results remained elusive. SEDGs account for the country’s overwhelming population, but their children’s share in quality school educational institutions has been minimal over the years. Early childhood care and education (ECCE) needs to be handled more comprehensively. According to the Unified-District Information System for Education (U-DISE) 2016-17 data, about 19.6 per cent of students belonged to Scheduled Castes (SCs) at the primary level, but this fraction fell to 17.3 per cent at the higher secondary level. These enrollment drop-outs were more severe for ST students (10.6 per cent to 6.8 per cent), and differently-abled children (1.1 per cent to 0.25 per cent), with even greater declines for female students within each of these categories. Thus, there is no scope for any complacency on the part of the government. A series of interventions including better facilities, more and more hostels, scholarships and other enabling support have been provisioned in the NEP-2020 so that the idea of ‘learning for all’ is realised in a more comprehensive manner.

Teachers are not only an integral part of an education system, but the most important stakeholder in the entire gamut of things. Their quality and ability to teach school students, when they are in their formative age, become something of paramount importance. From their recruitment to training, every precaution needs to be taken to ensure that school education is not rendered to a mere formality, but becomes a game changer. The New Education Policy-2020 comes with a basket full of tools and parameters to ensure holistic training and upgradation of teachers and their teaching skills in a sustainable manner. From continuous professional development (CPD) to career management and progression (CMP), the NEP-2020 vouches for a set of common guidelines – National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST), which will be put in place by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) in its restructured new form as the Professional Standard Setting Body (PSSB) under the General Education Council. This exercise will be carried out in consultation with National Council Educational Research and Training (NCERT), SCERTs, teachers from across levels and regions.

The teacher education will also undergo a sea-change. By 2030, the minimum degree qualification for teaching will be a 4-year integrated B.Ed. that teaches a range of knowledge content. Today B.Ed. teaching is most poorly regulated in our country ever since the standalone B.Ed. colleges were allowed to be opened up in the private sector. It is high time to take B.Ed. teaching more than seriously. The NEP-2020 stipulates that by 2021, a new and comprehensive National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education (NCFTE-2021) will be formulated by the NCTE. NCFTE, which will also factor in the requirements of teacher education curricula for vocational education, will be revised once every 5-10 years.

In conclusion, the NEP-2020 visualizes to impart a school education which lays the foundation of a self-reliant India and also to help our country emerge as a knowledge hub. From the foundation of learning to foundational literacy and numeracy to checking drop outs and ensuring universal access to education for all and at all levels to the restructuring of school curriculum, India is in for a metamorphosis in the field of school education, recognizing, identifying and fostering the unique capabilities of each student. Tools such as multi disciplinarity, emphasis on conceptual understanding, creativity and critical thinking, ethics and human and constitutional values, full equity and inclusion, and light but tight regulatory framework are bound to do wonders. Education is a public service, a rare pursuit in nation building, which should be holistic and inclusive and must make one take pride in India and its rich, diverse, ancient and modern culture and knowledge systems and tradition. The NEP-2020 aspires so, indeed!

 ( The writer is a senior journalist and author. The views expressed are strictly personal.)

NEP-2020 aspires for inclusive excellence in school education

 

Rajeev Ranjan Roy          

 

The New Education Policy-2020 (NEP-2020), unveiled recently, aims at achieving excellence in school learning by imparting quality, affordable and inclusive education to all, with an extra emphasis on those children coming from socially and educationally disadvantaged groups of the society. It is a futuristic endeavour towards building Ek Bharat, Shrestha Bharat. The previous education policies largely focussed on the issues of access and equity in giving school education, while the NEP-2020 commits to laying the foundation of a vibrant Bharat where no one is devoid of a kind of school education, which helps every student become an asset for the nation in a true sense. The unfinished agenda of the National Policy on Education 1986, which was modified in 1992, has been effectively dealt with in the NEP-2020 along with the vision behind the Right to the Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, which “laid down legal underpinnings for achieving universal elementary education.”

Given the undisputed role of education in nation building, the NEP-2020 rightly lays the stress on standardization and accreditation of school infrastructure and teachers as well, since education with accountability, transparency and affordability is the need of the hour, and hence the need to “empower schools, teachers with trust, enabling them to strive for excellence and perform at their very best, while ensuring the integrity of the system through the enforcement of complete transparency and full public disclosure of all finances, procedures and outcomes.” Since private sector is significantly present in the field of school education, the idea to promote ‘not-for-profit’ entities is a unique feature of NEP-2020, which at the same time intends to promote private philanthropic efforts for quality education, thereby affirming the public-good nature of education, while protecting parents and communities from arbitrary increase in tuition fees.

An equally important area, which has got due attention in the NEP-2020 is the need for efficient resourcing and effective governance through school complexes and clusters, a significant initiative in view of the fact that nearly 28 per cent of India’s public primary schools and 14.8 per cent of upper primary schools have less than 30 students. The average number of students per grade in the elementary schooling system – Grades 1 to 8 – is about 14, with a notable proportion having below six students during 2016-17, the year which also had 1,08,017 single-teacher schools, and majority of them – 85,743 – being primary schools taking care of Grades 1-5 children. It was, therefore, a pressing need to evolve a mechanism for establishing a grouping structure, say, school complexes, consisting of one secondary school together with all other schools, which lead to greater resource efficiency and more effective functioning, coordination, leadership, governance, and management of schools in the cluster. This will not only ensure optimum utilisation of resources, but will also foster the sense of oneness and togetherness among the school children, who are the future of the nation.

What further makes the New Education Policy-2020 uniquely special is its pledge for equitable and inclusive education for all, one of the great dreams of our founding fathers. Education, as the NEP-2020 rightly envisions, is “the single greatest tool for achieving social justice and quality.” Inclusive and equitable education, indeed an essential goal in its own right, is also critical to achieving a social order where every citizen has “the opportunity to dream, thrive, and contribute to the nation.” Quality, affordable and ethical education to all is the first move to break multiple social and economic barriers, which sow the seeds of exclusion, discrimination and exploitation against our own people on different parochial considerations.

Needless to say efforts were made in the past as well to bridge the educational chasm between socially and educationally disadvantaged groups (SEDGs) and the children of top social strata, but the desired results remained elusive. SEDGs account for the country’s overwhelming population, but their children’s share in quality school educational institutions has been minimal over the years. Early childhood care and education (ECCE) needs to be handled more comprehensively. According to the Unified-District Information System for Education (U-DISE) 2016-17 data, about 19.6 per cent of students belonged to Scheduled Castes (SCs) at the primary level, but this fraction fell to 17.3 per cent at the higher secondary level. These enrollment drop-outs were more severe for ST students (10.6 per cent to 6.8 per cent), and differently-abled children (1.1 per cent to 0.25 per cent), with even greater declines for female students within each of these categories. Thus, there is no scope for any complacency on the part of the government. A series of interventions including better facilities, more and more hostels, scholarships and other enabling support have been provisioned in the NEP-2020 so that the idea of ‘learning for all’ is realised in a more comprehensive manner.

Teachers are not only an integral part of an education system, but the most important stakeholder in the entire gamut of things. Their quality and ability to teach school students, when they are in their formative age, become something of paramount importance. From their recruitment to training, every precaution needs to be taken to ensure that school education is not rendered to a mere formality, but becomes a game changer. The New Education Policy-2020 comes with a basket full of tools and parameters to ensure holistic training and upgradation of teachers and their teaching skills in a sustainable manner. From continuous professional development (CPD) to career management and progression (CMP), the NEP-2020 vouches for a set of common guidelines – National Professional Standards for Teachers (NPST), which will be put in place by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) in its restructured new form as the Professional Standard Setting Body (PSSB) under the General Education Council. This exercise will be carried out in consultation with National Council Educational Research and Training (NCERT), SCERTs, teachers from across levels and regions.

The teacher education will also undergo a sea-change. By 2030, the minimum degree qualification for teaching will be a 4-year integrated B.Ed. that teaches a range of knowledge content. Today B.Ed. teaching is most poorly regulated in our country ever since the standalone B.Ed. colleges were allowed to be opened up in the private sector. It is high time to take B.Ed. teaching more than seriously. The NEP-2020 stipulates that by 2021, a new and comprehensive National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education (NCFTE-2021) will be formulated by the NCTE. NCFTE, which will also factor in the requirements of teacher education curricula for vocational education, will be revised once every 5-10 years.

In conclusion, the NEP-2020 visualizes to impart a school education which lays the foundation of a self-reliant India and also to help our country emerge as a knowledge hub. From the foundation of learning to foundational literacy and numeracy to checking drop outs and ensuring universal access to education for all and at all levels to the restructuring of school curriculum, India is in for a metamorphosis in the field of school education, recognizing, identifying and fostering the unique capabilities of each student. Tools such as multi disciplinarity, emphasis on conceptual understanding, creativity and critical thinking, ethics and human and constitutional values, full equity and inclusion, and light but tight regulatory framework are bound to do wonders. Education is a public service, a rare pursuit in nation building, which should be holistic and inclusive and must make one take pride in India and its rich, diverse, ancient and modern culture and knowledge systems and tradition. The NEP-2020 aspires so, indeed!

 ( The writer is a senior journalist and author. The views expressed are strictly personal.)